Definition of literature review process - Peer Review | Definition of Peer Review by Merriam-Webster

This entails selecting the review topic, carrying out a literature search, reading, critiquing and analyzing the literature.

A well-organized literature review will consist of an introduction, a main body that critiques the findings of previous work, addressing both theoretical and empirical literature, a discussion and a conclusion. Sage, Research Goals and the Literature Review "There should be clear links between the aims of your research and the literature review, the choice of research designs and means used to collect data, your discussion of the issues, and your conclusions and recommendations.

To summarize, we can say that the research should: A master's thesis is therefore a demonstration in research thinking and doing. There are many bogus sites; Internet publishing is relatively easy and inexpensive and is entirely missing the extensive checks and balances system that operates in most publishing houses.

To assess the reliability of a website, check out the author: Is her or his name clearly visible? Is there a link to the author's email address or to a legitimate and well-known university's home page or library page?

Does the author belong to or represent an organization--and is there additional information about the organization or a link to the organization's website? Does the information presented there seem reliable?

How do you know? Are sources for the information listed?

Does the information have a particular slant or bias? Understanding may be challenging because the literature could introduce the scholar to new terminology, conceptual framework and methodology. Comprehension particularly for new scholars is often improved by taking careful notes.

This is particularly true if the literature review is to be a chapter in a future empirical study. The literature review begins to inform the research question, and methodological approaches.

When scholars analyze fourth category in Bloom's taxonomy they are able to separate material into parts and figure out how the parts fit together. Analysis of the literature allows the scholar to develop frameworks for analysis and the ability to see the big picture and know how details from the literature fit within the big picture.

Analysis facilitates the development of an outline list. The books, articles and monographs read will be of different quality and value. In other words, they draw new and original insights from the literature.

They may be able to find a fresh and original research question, identify a heretofore, unknown gap in the literature or make surprising connections. By understanding how ways of thinking connect to tasks of a literature review, a scholar is able to be self-reflective and bring metacognition to the process of reviewing the literature.